Skip to main content

Literature Review Supports Gluten Sensitivity As Its Own Disease

Over the past couple years, I have seen posts on social media mocking people who avoid gluten even though they do not have Celiac Disease, claiming that these people are basically idiots because there is ZERO scientific evidence that people should avoid gluten unless they have Celiac Disease. It really frustrates me because I personally know many people, including family members, who suffer from what is known as Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS).

Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity is when people who do not have Celiac disease or a wheat allergy, experience gastrointestinal issues or non-gastrointestinal issues (like headaches) or both, after ingesting gluten containing food. As more research is done on NCGS, the data strongly suggests that it is indeed its own disease/condition. 

Although there are many studies that have been published about NCGS, I thought I would share a literature review that I found quite compelling. The review is based on international literature that was found using Medline and Pubmed and the authors of the literature review determined that "It has been demonstrated that patients suffering from NCGS are a heterogeneous group, composed of several subgroups, each characterized by different parthenogenesis, clinical history, and probably, clinical course". 

So basically, the authors found ample evidence in the current scientific literature to confirm that Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity is a real disorder...which is interesting since there is zero scientific evidence lol.

To read the article abstract click here.

  1. Mansueto P, Seidita A, D'Alcamo A, Carroccio A,. J Am Coll Nutr. 2014; 33(1): 39-54. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: literature review




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yet Another Reason To Avoid Spinal Surgery: Adjacent Segment Disease

Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD), sometimes called Accelerated Adjacent Segment Degeneration, occurs after a spinal fusion surgery. Due to the fusion of multiple vertebrae, there are bio-mechanical changes to the way the spine functions; the area that is fused loses its ability to move properly. When this occurs, the vertebrae and their joints, immediately above and below the fusion will degenerate at an accelerated rate due to an increase in stress on the joints and spinal discs. So let's back up for a minute. Common causes for spinal fusion surgery included degenerative, bulging, or herniated discs which creates stenosis of the spine and puts pressure on nerves causing nerve pain, numbness/tingling, and loss of function in the extremities. Usually, these types of disc issues are caused by excessive stress on the spinal discs and joints over a long period of time which slowly weakens the discs until they collapse. So once a spinal fusion has been done to "correct" the

3 Injuries Caused By Your Phone

Cell phones have basically take over our lives and as society we spend a lot of time on our phones. Research conducted by British psychologist estimate that young adults spend up to 5 hours a day on their phone. With the dramatic increase in our cell phone use, doctors are now starting to see more and more cell phone related injuries and conditions. Here are three common conditions that are caused by spending too much time on your phone. 1. Blackberry Thumb Blackberry Thumb is a repetitive stress injury that is caused by over use of the thumb when typing on your phone or playing games. (Since Blackberries are no longer made, maybe Ithumb would be a better name). The actual condition could be called a couple different names including De Quervain syndrome, Tenosynovitis, or just tendonitis of the thumb. The general symptoms include pain, swelling, or tenderness in the thumb and/or wrist. Because this is an over use injury, it usually heals on its own if you give your thumb enough tim

Back Problems? The Doctor You See First Matters...BIG TIME!

Back pain is one of the most common reasons for a person to seek help from a doctor, but who you decide to go to first can make a huge difference in the outcome.  A prospective study done on 1,885 individuals in the state of Washington found that  approximately 42.7% of workers who first saw a surgeon ended up having surgery. In contrast, only 1.5% of those who saw a chiropractor ended up getting surgery.  So what does this mean for patients? The first point to make about this study is chiropractic works. If chiropractic wasn't effective, the number of people receiving surgery after chiropractic care would be much higher, but as the numbers show, there is a stark contrast. The second point is less money spent. With deductibles skyrocketing many people are paying upwards to $10,000 out of pocket before their insurance coverage will start. Compare this with average cost of chiropractic care in the neighborhood of $500-$1500. That is a pretty substantial amount for a patient t